PC Pals Forum

General Discussion => Science & Nature => Topic started by: sam on March 18, 2010, 04:05

Title: Science in court: Head case
Post by: sam on March 18, 2010, 04:05

http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100317/full/464340a.html

Quote

Last year, functional magnetic resonance imaging made its debut in court. Virginia Hughes asks whether the technique is ready to weigh in on the fate of murderers.

Title: Re: Science in court: Head case
Post by: Clive on March 18, 2010, 10:42

Perhaps such a technique could be used on John Venables.  That might settle the argument as to whether he should be jailed or go free. 

Title: Re: Science in court: Head case
Post by: Rik on March 18, 2010, 11:04

Is there an argument?

Title: Re: Science in court: Head case
Post by: Clive on March 18, 2010, 11:33

Isn't there always?  They are trying to say he could not be responsible for his actions at such a young age.  But I would not like to give him the benefit of the doubt.  I'm now a bad person because I've said that.   ::) 

Title: Re: Science in court: Head case
Post by: Rik on March 18, 2010, 11:37

You are, Clive, but so's about 80% of the population. ;)

Title: Re: Science in court: Head case
Post by: Simon on March 18, 2010, 14:09

The lawyers would say anything to get someone off.  He's obviously a very dangerous and damaged character who should never be allowed out again.